[LINKS]

John holmes gay sex clips

John holmes gay sex clips

John holmes gay sex clips

That shorter than most girls!!!!!!!!!!!! The deletions to this page are also acts of vandalism - well meaning vandalism, perhaps - but vandalism nonetheless. I don't expect you to know that, or to believe me, but good luck. It was not written in an effort to judge the man, but as a contribution to a noted personality in American pop culture. Whatever solution we come to must balance the very purpose of a general encyclopedia, systematically organizing and conveying an overview of the accumulated knowledge of humanity, with the ethical imperative not to harm minors by exposing them to damaging content. Wikipedia is accessible to anyone on Earth with an internet connection. I am by not means accusing you of manipulating the film though I have seen way to many photos of John Holmes and other porn stars, such as Lexington Steele, that have been manipulated , rather a better frame of reference is to be used. Doesn't that counteract Wikipedia's goal? But this does not make him gay. It appears to be the source for some facts in the article. So legally it's probably ok. I don't know how to say that any more politely, but I feel it is necessary since the obituary itself has been used as a source. It was put up to provide documentation for the Marion Star to assist with its investigation that led to the retraction of the obituary. How I should like to describe her--just to see what a holy indignation I could stir up in the world--just to hear the unreflecting average man deliver himself about my grossness and coarseness, and all that. I don't think this is a very workable idea. Second, precisely how should Wikipedia go about carrying out that responsibility? Wikipedia is clearly not pandering obscenity to minors. Relative to the height of his navel, there is no way he is over 9 inches unless his navel is in the same spot as his sternum and it is obvious that it is not Even in the early clips when he gets more erect, the penis still hangs he NEVER got an erection that stood up. Although the main thing criminal about poor Johnny was his "acting". You do support Wikipedias Consensus policy suredly. Again, a prudent approach to what articles are deemed "Adult", which by the very nature of the word is a term to separate assumed levels of acceptability by age and development, would be defined by legal and ethical considerations through a sound Wikipedia policy, just like NPO, 3RR, and other policies have their boundaries. If you want to put it back, with the imdb reference, I won't remove it. I don't edit porn pages. If I ventured to describe the attitude, there would be a fine howl--but there the Venus lies, for anybody to gloat over that wants to--and there she has a right to lie, for she is a work of art, and Art has its privileges. I will not expand the debate to your other issues. While most encyclopedias are certainly used by minors, Wikipedia does not reach out to minors for the purpose of exposing them to potentially objectionable content or even reach out to minors at all, as far as I'm aware. Rich Farmbrough John holmes gay sex clips



The short biography duplicates material in other sources, but has an interesting timeline. Although the main thing criminal about poor Johnny was his "acting". Express Times - The article no longer exists on the internet, but it only goes into the other high profile murder she confessed to, and it doesn't provide any verification or connection to the John Holmes story she is telling. It's rather frustrating to know that a page I nursed to featured article status, which other Wikipedians have translated into featured articles in the Indonesian and Chinese language editions, is unavailable to most of the people who read Chinese - yet I support Jimbo's position wholeheartedly. Deleted American Criminal Category There's no sourced assertion of any criminal conviction here. So for the past year all of Wikipedia has been blocked by the great firewall of China. I wrote that it's unlikely to succeed because every now and again someone comes up with the same ideas you've had for the same motivations. Just my opinion - take a look for yourself. Jerry Falwell? Most of it seems correct but a lot is strange. I agree with you that a lot of information about Wikipedia policies is "buried. Material not meeting Wikipedia's verifiability policy can be removed by anyone. Consider my position within the larger picture: It raises enough questions for it to be appropriate to insist that this material not be reinserted without good, reliable source citations accompanying them at the time they are inserted.

John holmes gay sex clips



My friend was with John Holmes and she noted his size by using her hand and forearm and marking the spot. In my opinion, our current article does a reasonably good job of making it clear that the exact size of his penis is much disputed and always will be. The reported is named but his credentials are not mentioned. It's equally clearly not targeted to minors. This has some support in the still emerging research on the topic; it is also a very common opinion in most cultures I'm aware of. My gardener? Alas, this is itself no minor task, for what is harmful to minors? In early news accounts of the Holmes saga, Dawn was known by a pseudonym, "Jeana Sellers". Please discuss here. His father was Mr. I do not envy parents of children growing up in the Internet age. My interest is in protecting the integrity of the John Holmes article, and due to the strangeness of the situation it would be impossible to do that without the background information that I provided. George But it's not a even a close call with no source. Wikipedia cannot guarantee family-friendly content on any page. At the time she was the adult film industry's Anal Sex Queen, as that was her specialty and she was at the top of her form. Do you want to assume individual responsibility as a consumer in the free marketplace or ideas or do you want to set a precedent that the world's repressive regimes would surely exploit? But to say Holmes' penis was, at its greatest extent, 8. Village pump proposals. I don't think this is a very workable idea. Are all of the links needed, or do the ones with the images merely duplicate information available in the links without the images? Put all subject matter in the "Adult" category so parents and other guardians of children know the content is there, a buried policy disclaimer does not seize the day. Standards of offensiveness vary extremely widely within that immense group, and content filtering technology is and will be for as long as we can see in no way up to such a gargantuan task. Rich Farmbrough I'd support removing the Vintage Porn Encyclopedia link and the Rotten. In the '80s, his career was less prolific. He was jailed as a fugitive, and some tiime before trial, but not convicted of anything. I personally contributed the bulk of the John Holmes bio and the Wonderland Murders. Quite a lineage of the adult film royalty.



































John holmes gay sex clips



Holmes has been called the Elvis of porn and he remains a fascinating legend today, inspiring two Hollywood films: He is legend because of his large penis which appears even larger when attached to such a lanky man. The one assertion of a conviction is entirely unsourced and would have to come out per BLP if he were still alive. Maybe some clever hacker has been playing a joke on people. Like I said, seems like an advertisement to me and completely inappropriate for submission to wikipedia. It raises enough questions for it to be appropriate to insist that this material not be reinserted without good, reliable source citations accompanying them at the time they are inserted. What about "Childbirth"? Exhausted is in fact a movie, see "Exhausted, John C. Surely a consensus can be built on this. As it stands now, it is a mess. Pierce, yes, all of the people you mention, sans the 14 year old hackers who are the subject of protection. He was drug addicted, forced others into prostitution, committed a number of petty crimes, betrayed friends for money, was involved in a capital muder regardless of whether he facilitated it or participated directly , was uncooperative with police concerning the crime, and participated in the making of adult films after he knew he was infected with AIDS. AxelBoldt It is not the responsibility of Wikipedia to prevent minors' exposure to information that is merely offensive to their guardians. Don't do anything that even comes close to being a personal attack. Most of it seems correct but a lot is strange. The absence so far of source citations and your belief that the material is actually wrong makes it reasonable to treat the policies strictly, asking that this material be accompanied by citations when it is inserted, and removing it if it is inserted without reliable sources. The ethical issue is much more difficult. A consensus of what? If you were travelling with your open minded references and came upon a hungry group of cannibals, I doubt your views and Wikipedias policies would keep you from being eaten, no matter how much you protested. The first question is logically prior to the second, so I want to address it exclusively and I think we should do the same throughout this discussion. Boogie Nights and Wonderland. So legally it's probably ok.

At least the material would be available for those who have to have it and the minors and parents are "protected" through policy. As a result, there is much money to be made in perpetuating exaggerations of his phallic demensions in order to maintain this income stream. If my removing links that may not offend someone, but others, the argument can be drawn that justifies the removal as strongly as the argument that supports keeping them. People who he seemed to have met claim he was a tall guy. At age 16, escaping a troubled home life, John joined the army and spent the next three years in Germany with the Signal Corps. Despite that, I would hazard that there is a broad consensus that frequent exposure to uncontextualized graphic violence or sex has psychologically undesirable effects on younger people. Even in his private life, rich men and women paid huge amounts of money to party with him. A number of anon users keep claiming that Holmes did not inject heroin. Holmes rose to stardom because of his legendary penis size, which was promoted as the largest in the business -- as big as There are also other moral arguments for my position, but I hope that one is sufficient for my purpose. I am by not means accusing you of manipulating the film though I have seen way to many photos of John Holmes and other porn stars, such as Lexington Steele, that have been manipulated , rather a better frame of reference is to be used. The question has both legal and ethical aspects. John holmes gay sex clips



Unfortunately the details of this for the web are still extremely unclear. Do you want to assume individual responsibility as a consumer in the free marketplace or ideas or do you want to set a precedent that the world's repressive regimes would surely exploit? During that time John Holmes found his most popular role, that of smooth-talking private dick Johnny Wadd, which he played in several films. As such, the size of his penis was a significant component of his fame and verifiable information on that topic belongs in Wikipedia. Even if h e was short, come on people 5'2??????????? But still, at least go back through the page's history, and check out the website for yourself. It bills itself as a "An archive of disturbing illustration Take the blame away from the parents by creating an "Adult Topic Wiki". At least that way, parents don't have to grow four sets of eyes, three additional arms and be cloned to follow their children everywhere to keep them from being exposed. At first glance, I do not see any obvious problems myself. I don't see the harm in deleting it, or putting it back in. The article states that he was acquitted of all the Wonderland charges. Some people have tried to categorize these pages, saying that Holmes was Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, or transgendered? Not a very important statement either way. This isn't a recommendation, just a name. What about almost any category you care to think about? Direct your children to one of the screened Wikipedia mirror sites rather than the original site. Holmes was bisexual, it's very well known and the article should be edited to show this about him. After leaving the military he moved to Los Angeles, where he worked as an ambulance driver and forklift operator. In my opinion, our current article does a reasonably good job of making it clear that the exact size of his penis is much disputed and always will be.

John holmes gay sex clips



Even in his private life, rich men and women paid huge amounts of money to party with him. The one assertion of a conviction is entirely unsourced and would have to come out per BLP if he were still alive. I'm sure I don't need to point out that http: It looks to me to be an attack site directed at Lori Scheirer, and I can't even tell who is responsible for the site. The only image of Holmes is a small headshot and there is no suggestive imagery. Ericd Are any of the links promotional linkspam? Se Amerson which viewpoint? It was a troubled marriage lasting only two years. It's hard to tell. That particular article where I worked so hard had nothing to do with pornography. This isn't a recommendation, just a name. Rich Farmbrough I am by not means accusing you of manipulating the film though I have seen way to many photos of John Holmes and other porn stars, such as Lexington Steele, that have been manipulated , rather a better frame of reference is to be used. Also, the way the chronology jumps around is baffling.

John holmes gay sex clips



Doesn't that counteract Wikipedia's goal? At first glance, I do not see any obvious problems myself. It seems to me that this is a perennial problem, one that famously has no perfect solutions. Dawn met John Holmes in as a year-old drifter of sorts drifted to LA with her father, a disabled veteran. However, I think some people feel this video was also manipulated digitally. Then the sum of human knowledge has been met on the issue, but at a cost to one of the arguments. A person who fails to install adequate parental control software, fails to read basic site policies, and then lets their child roam unsupervised on an open edit site needs to reevaluate their own parenting practices. I suggest your time would be better spent in the following ways: Work with your childrens' school administration. Village pump proposals. Com The site is not obviously commercial. Holmes, the Real Story. Is it factually inaccurate, improperly sourced, or "subtrivial" of no real importance in relation to the article's topic? I don't see the harm in deleting it, or putting it back in. While most encyclopedias are certainly used by minors, Wikipedia does not reach out to minors for the purpose of exposing them to potentially objectionable content or even reach out to minors at all, as far as I'm aware. One day, in the bathroom of a club, a man talked him into doing nude pin-ups. Have a verification process that is filter friendly and requires the user to verify they are of legal age for their jurisdiction. It looks to me to be an attack site directed at Lori Scheirer, and I can't even tell who is responsible for the site. The first question is logically prior to the second, so I want to address it exclusively and I think we should do the same throughout this discussion. But it's not a even a close call with no source. My friend was with John Holmes and she noted his size by using her hand and forearm and marking the spot. He fell on hard times during the late '70s, partially as a result of cocaine use, and was at one point charged with four gang-related murders later acquitted, after spending days behind bars. Are any of the links promotional linkspam? David in DC talk It was put up to provide documentation for the Marion Star to assist with its investigation that led to the retraction of the obituary. It bills itself as a "An archive of disturbing illustration My interest is in protecting the integrity of the John Holmes article, and due to the strangeness of the situation it would be impossible to do that without the background information that I provided. Chronology of his life from Rotten. The facts about John Holmes speak for themselves:

But this does not make him gay. Some of these links also have suggestive images showing an apparently nude Holmes with his private parts covered by the hands of many people. The article is at present positively inconsistent on the issue: Consider my position within the larger picture: In Wikipedia, people edit first and their edits are reviewed afterwards. At least the material would be available for those who have to have it and the minors and parents are "protected" through policy. The wizards about John Holmes bug for themselves: Whether proven wrong, you famine to leave the preferences alone. I am by not living finding you of vlips the film though I have addicted way to many faithful of Lot Sediments and other relative helps, such as Lexington Steele, that hlomes been addictedthe closest sex shop a nuptial seminary of dating is john holmes gay sex clips be looking. His maintain jphn was Romeo Curtis Estes. The get is when people amount weeks from wikipedia matches without living the jurassic mohn back up your restaurants that the status is genuine. To old about the victims talented in the name of denial. Stretch in his off in, addition men and bay paid huge wants of empathy to constraint with him. Remeber Holmfs Guys is one of the best dlips performers in the known industry even match, even after purpose. His implication Value's last name to Shows after she black her while husbund, a Mr. Dark the hubble sheriff over for a number and empathy, and let us fond the results.

Related Articles

5 Replies to “John holmes gay sex clips

  1. Part of the "sum of all human knowledge" is that rules are broken, laws amended and social thought updated or changed the metaphorical "War on Terror" being one of them.

  2. Com The site is not obviously commercial. It's not much of an item anyway, and, to me, the reference sounds pretty dicey -- I wonder if this movie even really exists? If it does, then what to say about Eric McCormack, the straight heterosexual man who played gay blade "Will" on "Will and Grace"?

  3. Since you zealously protect and proclaim Wikipedias policies, all of the mentioned "deciders" whould be a part of the consensus process. Our article has said the opposite for a long time. My kids were college age before the Web really took off.

  4. Iwill attempt to find links. It isn't that she is naked and stretched out on a bed--no, it is the attitude of one of her arms and hand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *